Monday 9 January 2023

Procedure where an identical question of law is pending before High Courts or Supreme Court [Section 158AB]

The pendency of appeals at various judicial fora has been a grave concern for the taxpayers and tax administrators. The Government in recent times has taken steps to reduce the pendency by increasing the tax-effect thresholds for Revenue's appeals. The Finance Act, 2022 has introduced Section 158AB in furtherance of the Government’s pursuit of minimising litigation.

Background

 Explaining the provisions of section 158AA and section 158AB

Clause 51 seeks to amend section 158AA of the Act relating to procedure when in an appeal by revenue an identical question of law is pending before Supreme Court. 

It is proposed to insert a proviso in sub-section (1) in the said section to provide that no direction shall be given under this sub-section on or after the 1st day of April, 2022. 

This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2022. 

Clause 52 seeks to insert a new section 158AB in the Act relating to procedure where an identical question of law is pending before the High Courts or Supreme Court. 

The Finance Act, 2022, with effect from 01.04.2022 has inserted Section 158AB which provides that in a case of an assessee wherein the question of law arising from an order of Commissioner (Appeals) or the ITAT for a particular assessment year is identical to a question of law that is pending before jurisdictional High Court or the Supreme Court in:

(a) assessee’s own case for any other assessment year; or
(b) any other assessee’s case for any assessment year,

Then to avoid duplicity of appeal before judicial forums, based on the communication from Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, the Assessing Officer shall not file an appeal before the jurisdictional High Court or the ITAT. The Assessing Officer shall instead file an application to the jurisdictional High Court or the ITAT that the appeal on the question of law in the assessee’s case may be filed when the decision on such question of law, in the other case, becomes final.

Text of Section 158AB

[1][Procedure where an identical question of law is pending before High Courts or Supreme Court

158AB. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where the collegium is of the opinion that—

(a)  any question of law arising in the case of an assessee for any assessment year (such case being herein referred to as the relevant case) is identical with a question of law arising,—

 (i)  in his case for any other assessment year; or

(ii)  in the case of any other assessee for any assessment year; and

(b)  such question is pending before the jurisdictional High Court under section 260A or the Supreme Court in an appeal under section 261 or in a special leave petition under article 136 of the Constitution, against the order of the Appellate Tribunal or the jurisdictional High Court, as the case may be, which is in favour of such assessee (such case being herein referred to as the other case),

the collegium may, decide and inform the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner not to file any appeal, at this stage, to the Appellate Tribunal under sub-section (2) of section 253 or to the jurisdictional High Court under sub-section (2) of section 260A in the relevant case against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be.

(2) The Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner shall, on receipt of a communication from the collegium under sub-section (1), notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3) of section 253 or clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 260A, direct the Assessing Officer to make an application to the Appellate Tribunal or the jurisdictional High Court, as the case may be, in such form as may be prescribed within a period of one hundred and twenty days from the date of receipt of the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) or of the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be, stating that an appeal on the question of law arising in the relevant case may be filed when the decision on such question of law becomes final in the other case.

(3) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall direct the Assessing Officer to make an application under sub-section (2) only if an acceptance is received from the assessee to the effect that the question of law in the other case is identical to that arising in the relevant case; and in case no such acceptance is received, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3) of section 253 or clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 260A, proceed in accordance with the provisions contained in sub-section (2) of section 253 or in clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 260A.

(4) Where the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) or the order of the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be, referred to in sub-section (1) is not in conformity with the final decision on the question of law in the other case, as and when such order is received, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may direct the Assessing Officer to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal or the jurisdictional High Court, as the case may be, against such order and save as otherwise provided in this section all other provisions of Part B and Part CC of Chapter XX shall apply accordingly.

(5) Every appeal under sub-section (4) shall be filed within a period of sixty days to the Appellate Tribunal or one hundred and twenty days to the High Court as the case may be, from the date on which the order of the jurisdictional High Court or the Supreme Court in the other case is communicated to the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner (having jurisdiction over the relevant case), in accordance with the procedure specified by the Board in this behalf.

Explanation. - For the purposes of this section, “collegium” means a collegium comprising of two or more Chief Commissioners or Principal Commissioners or Commissioners, as may be specified by the Board in this behalf.]

KEY NOTE

1.  Inserted by the Finance Act, 2022, with effect from 01.04.2022.

Comparatives between deleted Section 158AA and the newly introduced section 158AB

 

Particulars

As per Section 158AA

As per Section 158AB

Authority to decide ‘identical question of law’

[Directing Authority to Assessing Officer

Commissioner or Principal Commissioner, suo moto.

Commissioner or Principal Commissioner, on directions received from “Collegium”

 

(Collegium comprising of two or more Chief Commissioners or Principal Commissioners or Commissioners)

Appellate forum where appeal is pending

Supreme Court

Jurisdictional High Court or Supreme Court

Reference to Case Pending

When the case is decided by CIT(A) in the favour of assessee and Revenue needs to file an appeal with ITAT

When the case is decided by CIT(A) or ITAT in the favour of assessee and Revenue needs to file an appeal with ITAT against the order of CIT(A) or with High Court against the order of ITAT.

Whose Appeal is pending

Assessee only

Assessee or any other person

Applicability of Section

When the case is decided by CIT(A) in the favour of assessee and Revenue needs to file an appeal with ITAT

When the case is decided by CIT(A) or ITAT in the favour of assessee and Revenue needs to file an appeal with ITAT against the order of CIT(A) or with High Court against the order of ITAT.

Time Limit for application to ITAT / High Court

60 Days from the date of CIT Appeals order

§  60 Days from the date of CIT Appeals order

§  120 Days from the date of ITAT order

Form for Application

Form 8

Form 8A

Time Limit for Appeal to ITAT / High Court

60 Days from the order of Supreme Court pronounced in the case of assessee where question of law was pending.

60 Days from the order of High Court or Supreme Court pronounced in the case of same assessee or any other assessee of where question of law was pending.

 Manner for constitution of collegium to decide deferment of appeals under Section 158AB

The Finance Act, 2022 inserted a Section 158AB to provide for deferment of appeal in the case of an assessee wherein the question of law is identical to a question of law that is pending before the jurisdictional High Court or the Supreme Court. To decide on such deferment, the CBDT vide order letter F. No. 370133/13/2022-TPL, dated 28.09.2022 has specified the manner for the constitution of the collegium. The Collegium shall comprise three members who are officers of the rank of Pr. CIT or CIT.

ORDER

Subject : Order specifying the Collegium - Explanation to section 158AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - regarding

In exercise of powers conferred under the Explanation to section 158AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), the Central Board of Direct Taxes (read as ‘Board’) hereby specifies that for the purpose of deciding deferment of appeals before the Appellate Tribunal or the jurisdictional High Court by the Assessing Officer under section 158AB of the Act, a Collegium shall be constituted as under:- (i)

S.No.

   Appeals in Jurisdiction

Collegium to be Constituted By

1.

International tax and Transfer Pricing

Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (International tax and Transfer Pricing)

2.

Exemption Charge

Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions)

3.

Central Charges

Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) or DGIT(Inv) - [Jurisdictional]

4.

All other cases

Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (CCA) - [Jurisdictional]

(ii) The Collegium shall comprise of three members who are officers of the rank of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) or Commissioner of Income-tax (CIT);

(iii) The members shall be:-

(a)      the PCIT or CIT having jurisdiction over the case in which defennent of appeal is to be decided under section 158AB(I); and

(b) two other officers of the rank of PCIT or CIT nominated by respective Pr.CCIT/CCITIDGIT mentioned in the table in (i) above;

(iv) The Collegium may co-opt one officer of the rank of PCIT or CIT ifit so decides;

(v) The seniormost member of the Collegium shall act as the Chairperson of the Collegium.

2. This order comes into effect from the date of its issue.

CBDT notifies Form 8A to make application under section 158AB to defer filing of appeal before ITAT & High Court on identical issues

CBDT, vide Notification No. 83/2022 dated 12.07.2022 notifies new Rule 16 and Form No. 8A pursuant to Section 158AB; As per the Rule, the Assessing Officer is required to file Form No. 8A for deferring the filling of appeal before the ITAT or jurisdictional High Court by furnishing the particulars as prescribed in the Form.

Application under section 158AB to defer filing of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal or the jurisdictional High Court [Rule 16]

The application referred to in section 158AB(2), required to be made before the Appellate Tribunal or the jurisdictional High Court, as the case may be, shall be made in Form No. 8A by the Assessing Officer.

 Text of Rule 16

Application under section 158AB to defer filing of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal or the jurisdictional High Court.

16. The application referred to in sub-section (2) of section 158AB, required to be made before the Appellate Tribunal or the jurisdictional High Court, as the case may be, shall be made in Form No. 8A by the Assessing Officer

Decision under section 158AB is to be taken by a Collegium comprising of two or more CCIT or PCIT or CIT;

·        Section 158AB is to apply when a question of law in a proposed appeal, is identical to question of law in case of the very same assessee or in case of any other assessee;

 ·        Such question should be pending before the jurisdictional High Court u/s 260A of the Act or before the Supreme Court in an appeal u/s 261 of the Act or in a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India and such appeal/ petition has been filed by the Department;

 ·        In the above given facts, the Collegium may decide and inform PCIT/ CIT concerned to not file an appeal to ITAT or HC against the order of CIT(A) or ITAT respectively, if the question of law is identical;

 ·        On receipt of such communication from the Collegium, the PCIT/ CIT concerned shall direct the AO to file an application with ITAT or HC within the time limit to file appeal in the prescribed form and manner, instead of filing appeal;

·        However, such an application is to be filed only if acceptance to this effect is received from the assessee concerned within 30 days from the date of communication to the Assessee;

·        Further, if the question of law is decided by the High Court or the Supreme Court in favour of the Department, then appeal is to be filed within 60 days from the date of communication of such order to the PCIT/ CIT concerned in cases where an application has been made u/s 158AB of the Act.

Form No. 8A – Rule 16 of Income tax Rules

In order to prescribe the relevant form, the Board has amended the Rules vide Income-tax (22nd Amendment) Rules, 2022 and notified Form No. 8A in which the application shall be made by the Assessing Officer before the ITAT or jurisdictional High Court as per the provisions of section 158AB of the Act. Form No. 8A requires the particulars related to the question of law for which appeal is deferred and the details of other cases or cases on the basis of which appeal is deferred.

Form 8A seeks the following details from the Assessing Officer:

(a)  Appellant’s Personal Information;

(b)  Respondent’s Personal Information;

(c)  Case Details, such as Assessment Year, total income declared, details of order

      against which appeal is deferred, etc.;

(d)  Questions of Law for which appeal is deferred;

(e)  Details of other cases on the basis of which appeal is deferred; and

(f)   Due date for filing of application as per section 158AB(2).

  

Form No. 8A

[See rule 16]

In the High Court of ……… or

Income-tax Appellate Tribunal…..

(strike out whichever is inapplicable)

 

1.

Appellant’s Personal Information

Name/ designation of the Appellant (as applicable)

 

Complete address for sending notices

 

State

 

Pin code

 

Phone No. with STD code/ Mobile No.

 

Email Address

 

2.

Respondent’s Personal Information

Name/ designation of the Respondent (as applicable)

 

PAN (if available)

 

TAN (if available)

 

Complete address for sending notices

 

State

 

Pin code

 

Phone No. with STD code/ Mobile No.

 

Email Address (if available)

 

3.

Case Details

(a)

Assessment year in connection with which the appeal is deferred

 

(b)

Total income declared by the assessee for the assessment year referred to in item (a)

 

(c)

Details of the order against which appeal is deferred

 

(i)

Section and sub-section under which order is passed

 

(ii)

Date of order

 

(iii)

Date of service or communication of the order

 

(d)

Income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal passing the order against which appeal is deferred

 

(e)

The State and District in which the jurisdictional Assessing Officer is located

 

(f)

Section and sub-section under which the original order is passed

 

4.

Questions of Law for which appeal is deferred

 

Questions of Law

Relevant Section and sub-section of the Act

 

 

 

 

(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(b)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total tax effect

 

 

5.

Details of other case/ cases on the basis of which appeal is deferred

(a)

Name of the assessee

 

(b)

Court before which the appeal in the other case is pending

 

(c)

Question of law in the other case on the basis of which appeal in the instant case is deferred: -

 

 

(a)

 

 

 

(b)

 

 

 

(c)

 

 

6.

Due date for filing of application as per sub-section (2) of section 158AB

 

 

 

 

Explanation: For the purposes of this rule and form No. 8A, the words ― “relevant case” and -  “other case” shall have the same meaning as assigned to them in section 158AB of the Act.

 It is hereby certified that –

 

(a) the question(s) of law mentioned in item 4, arising in the case of the assessee for assessment year ___________ is/are identical with a question of law arising in:-

        a. his case for the assessment year ___________

b. the case of __________ for the assessment year ___________ ,

 

(b) the question(s) is/are pending before the jurisdictional High Court under section 260A or the Supreme Court in an appeal under section 261 or the Supreme Court in a Special Leave Petition under article 136 of the Constitution against the order of the Appellate Tribunal/ jurisdictional High Court as mentioned in item 5 above;

 

(c) the appeal on the question(s) of law mentioned in item 4 shall be filed in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 158AB of the Act.

 

Signed

(Appellant)

Name:_____________

Designation:_________

 

Form of Verification

 I, ______________, the appellant, do hereby declare that what is stated above is true to the best of my information and belief.

 

Place:______                                                                                          Signature:_________________

Date:_______                                                                                         Name:_______________

 

                                                                                                                  Designation:______________

 

Notes: If the space provided is found insufficient, separate enclosures may be used for the purpose.

 

  

No comments:

Post a Comment