A tax on capital gain was levied in 1947. The justification for a capital gain tax at that time was that the war had led to a large increase in prices and gains made from the sale of property were unearned increments.
There is stabilization objective behind taxation of
capital gains as well since in times of property more tax can be realized from
capital gains. Since the taxation of capital gains is more important to the
influential class of society than the treatment of any other type of income it
has been extremely controversial over the years.
Justification
of Capital Gains Tax
The
main benefits of capital gains tax are listed below :
(i)
MORE EQUITABLE:
It is argued that capital gains tax is more
equitable and that it can be used as a counter-cyclical measure. The strongest
argument is that the person making capital gains attains larger capacity to
pay. Therefore, equity principle demands
that the capital is to be taxed. Capital gains are a highly progressive source
of income to the rich. The rich reinvest their capital gains which become
recurring with time. Hence, in the absence of capital gains tax, the inequality
of income will be widened.
(ii)
HELPFUL DURING INFLATION:
During inflation, the value of capital rises and
capital gains occurs. If capital gains tax is progressive, then a large part of
the capital gains will be taken away by taxation. This will help controlling inflation.
In the reverse situation of deflation when the value of capital falls and
hence, capital gains decline, the rate of capital gains tax will decline more
than in proportion to decline in capital gains. This will check deflation.
Background
of introduction of Capital Gains-tax
Till the year 1946, Capital gains were not taxable
in India. During and after the Second World War, there was steep inflation in
the country and people not only earned substantial profit, but the value of
capital assets also appreciated substantially. It was in this background that
the budget of 1947 introduced capital gains-tax with effect from assessment
year 1947-48. While justifying its imposition, the Finance Minister observed
that “there is a stronger justification for taxing these profits than for
taxing ordinary income, since they represent what is properly described as
unearned increment.”
Abolition
of capital gains-tax
With effect from 01.04.1949, the levy of tax on
capital gains did not remain in effect for long, as it was deleted by the
Finance Act of 1949, with effect from assessment year 1949-50 on the ground
that its yield was very poor and that it discouraged investment. Thus the levy
of capital gains-tax remained on statute book only for two assessment years
viz., 1947-48 and 1948-49.
Although imposition of tax on capital gains was
justified, it was abolished in the year 1949 on account of its unpopularity,
low yield of revenue and adverse effect on the investment and movement of
capital. While explaining its abolition, the Finance Minister stated in his
budget speech that “its psychological effect on investment has, however, been
markedly adverse and it has had the effect of hampering the free movement of
stocks and shares without which it is hardly possible to maintain a high level
of industrial development”.
Thus the tax was short-lived and discontinued after
two years. Capital gains between 01.04.1946 and 31.03.1948 were liable to tax.
The non-taxable maximum limit was fixed at Rs. 15,000. In computing them the
taxpayer was given the option to adopt, instead of the actual cost of the
asset, its fair market value as on 01.04.1939. In the case of non-company
taxpayers, special rates of tax were prescribed ranging from one anna in the
rupee (6.25%) on capital gains upto Rs. 50,000 to five anna (31.25%) in the
rupee on gains above Rs. 10 lakhs. In the case of companies the tax was not to
be charged if the amount of capital
gains did not exceed Rs. 15,000. But where the gains exceeded this amount the
whole of it was taxed. The rate of tax for companies was the ordinary
income-tax rate applicable to them. In order to remove the apprehension that
“losses claimed may exceed the profits declared”, it was provided that capital
loss could be set-off only against capital gain and such loss could be carried
forward for six years only if it exceeded Rs. 15,000 in any year for
non-corporate taxpayers.
Prof.
Nicholos Kaldor’s recommendation
In the year 1955, Prof. Nicholas Kaldor was invited
to recommend tax reforms after studying the existing system of taxation in
India. He was entrusted with the job of suggesting reforms in Indian Tax Structure
argued strongly in favour of levy of capital gains tax. He not only found fault
with the reasoning for which the levy of capital gains-tax was abolished but
also criticized the approach in this regard. He was also of the view that the
full yield potential of the tax should only become apparent after it had been
in operation for 10 to 20 years and, therefore, it would be a great mistake to
treat the taxation of capital gains mainly on short-term revenue
considerations. He defended the levy of capital gains tax mainly on the ground
of equity in taxation as it involves the privileged treatment of the particular
class of taxpayers as against others. He found exclusion of capital gains from
the scope of Income taxation quite indefensible on the ground of administrative
efficiency also, since it enables taxpayers to camouflage income as tax-exempt
gain and to conceal gain. According to him, so long as the extent of taxation
is based on “income”, the only impartial concept of income is that which treats
all realized gains equally.
In
view of the above argument, Prof. Kaldor recommended re-introduction of the tax
at the earliest.
Re-introduction of capital
gains-tax in respect of transfers after 31.03.1956
After submission of report by Prof. Kaldor Committee
to levy tax on profits arising on sale/transfer of specified non-inventory
asset, the government reintroduced the levy of capital gains-tax by Finance Act
(No. 3) of 1956 (Special Budget of 1956-57). By the said Act, the Government
substituted section 12B by a new section which apart from making minor changes
consequential to introduction of Constitution of India in 1950 included changes
with regard to following:—
(i)
Definition of capital asset remained same.
(ii)
The basic exemption limit of Rs. 15,000/-
was reduced to Rs. 5,000/-.
(iii)
The assessee was given option to substitute the “fair market value” of the
assets as on 01.01.1954 in place of cost of acquisition where the assets were
acquired prior to 1954.
The non-taxable limit was fixed at Rs. 5,000 for
non-company taxpayers, with no liability to pay tax if the total income,
including the capital gains, did not exceed Rs. 10,000. One-third of such gains
would be added to the other income, and the income-tax rate applicable to the
sum so arrived at would be the rate at which the whole of these gains would be
taxed. In the case of registered firms, to attract tax, capital gains must
exceed Rs. 5,000 and total income, Rs. 40,000. As regards companies, the full
amount of such gains was taxable as income. Losses could be set-off, as before,
only against capital gains, but, could now be carried forward indefinitely
provided the capital loss sustained in any ‘previous year’ exceeded Rs. 5,000.
Since 1956, the tax treatment of capital gains has
been the subject-matter of investigation by various individuals and committees
such as S. Bhoothalingam in 1968, the Direct Taxes Enquiry Committee in 1971,
the Direct Tax Laws Committee in 1978 and Economic Administration Reforms Commission
in 1983 who have studied the taxation of capital gains and made some
recommendations. Consequently, almost every Finance Act contains some
provision/change in laws relating to capital gains taxation.
FIRST
PHASE
Section 114 which was substituted first by the
Finance Act, 1962 with effect from 01.04.1962, deals other than companies
omitted by the Finance Act, 1967 with effect from 01.04.1968 re-introduced with
material modifications in section 80T. (Deduction in respect of long-term
capital gains in the case of assessees other than companies)
Section 115 which deals with tax on capital gains in
case of companies inserted by Finance Act, 1962 with effect from 01.04.1962 and
omitted by the Finance Act, 1987 with effect from 01.04.1988.
SECOND
PHASE
The
relevant provisions of capital gains scattered in the form of section 80T under
Chapter VI-A and section 115 under Chapter XII in the form of a new section 48.
THIRD
PHASE
With effect from assessment year 1993-94, Tax
Reforms Committee, 1991 looked into various aspects of taxation of capital
gains. As per recommendations of Tax Reforms Committee, measures like
indexation for inflation were introduced.
BUDGET
: 2004-05
Abolished long-term capital gains on equity and
reduced the levy of shortterm capital gains to 10% from normal rates. This
budget also introduced a new tax called Security Transaction Tax (STT). Several
countries have considered Security Transaction Tax (STT) either as a substitute
for capital gains tax or as an independent tax. The general trend has been to
impose either capital gains tax or Security Transaction Tax (STT). There are
also instances of both types of taxes prevailing simultaneously such as in
France and Denmark. Security Transaction Tax (STT) is imposed in one form or
other in several countries like Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China,
France, Greece, Italy, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, UK and
Zimbabwe.
Present scenario
At present, Part E of Chapter-IV of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) consisting of sections 45 to 55A
exclusively deals with taxation of capital gains. As a result of constant
evolution, capital gains tax, as it stands today, is levied on transfer of all
capital assets (other than held as stock-in-trade) with a computation mechanism
prescribed under sections 45 to 55A of the Act. Over the past two decades,
several exemptions were incorporated in the statute to rationalize the levy
with a view to mitigate “undue hardship” to the taxpayers.
Residential status for the
purpose of taxation of Capital gain
(a) Where the assessee is a resident of India
Ø
capital
gains arising to him by transfer of his foreign assets would suffer taxation
since, a resident is chargeable to tax also on his income accruing or arising
abroad.
(b)
Where the assessee is a non-resident
Ø
any
profits or gains accruing to or received by him abroad or on the transfer of
any of his capital assets situate abroad would not be taxable. His liability
for capital gains taxation would be restricted to capital gains in respect of
assets, if any, situate in India.
Capital
gains are chargeable on accrual basis
It
is not necessary that the consideration should be received in the year of transfer
itself. Capital gains are chargeable on accrual basis.
Capital
gains tax is payable in year in which assessee has acquired a right to receive
profits, and its actual receipt in that year is not necessary.—[T. V. Sundaram
Iyengar & Sons Ltd. v. CIT (1959) 37 ITR 26 (Mad)]
Mercantile
method of accounting has to be followed
Under the head ‘capital gains’ is concerned, a
taxpayer has no option but to follow the mercantile method of accounting. In
other words, capital gains are chargeable to tax in the year in which the asset
is transferred irrespective of whether the sales consideration is actually
received.
MERCANTILE
OR ACCRUAL METHOD
Under
this method, transactions are considered as and when they are incurred or
earned whether they are received or not.
Receipt
of consideration in installments
Even
in that case also the entire consideration has to be taken into account for
computing the capital gains.
No
capital gains where sale itself declared null and void
The assessee transferred a certain amount of land
and computed capital gains therefrom. But the district collector declared the
sale as null and void under section 4 of the Gujarat Vacant Lands in Urban Area
(Prohibition of Alienation) Act, 1972 which prohibited alienation of land in
any vacant area after the commencement of the Act by way of sale, gift,
exchange, etc. The court held that as there was no sale transaction in the eye
of law, there could be no capital gain arising out of a null and void transfer
of such land. - [CIT v. Vithalbhai P. Patel (1998) 236 ITR 1001 (1999) 7 DTC 62 (Guj)]
Provisions
relating to capital gains should be construed strictly
It was held that capital gains is an artificial
income created by the provisions of the Act and as a result provisions relating
thereto should be strictly construed. In case of doubt, the assessee would be
entitled to the benefit of doubt. - [CIT v. Bhupender Singh Atwal (1983) 140 ITR
928 (Cal)]
Capital
gain is part of income though under separate head
Capital gain is a part of income and capital gains
tax is not to be regarded as an additional or separate tax distinct from
income-tax. This is based upon the principles laid down by the courts that
income-tax is only one tax and it is wrong to assume that there are as many
items of taxes as there are heads of income or sources of income. - [Karanpura
Development Co. Ltd. v. CIT (1962) 44 ITR 362 (SC); K. V. AL. M. Ramanathan
Chettiar v. CIT (1973) 88 ITR 169 (SC); Smt. Abida Khatoon v. CIT (1973) 87 ITR
627 (AP)]
One deeming section cannot be extended by importing another
deeming section
Deeming fiction
cannot be extended by importing another deeming fiction for the purpose of
determination of full value of consideration. – [CIT v. Moonmill Ltd (1966) 59 ITR 574 (SC)]
Capital gains in
case of erstwhile State Ruler
It
was held that in the case of an erstwhile State Ruler what is exempt is the
annual value of official house of such ruler. But the exemption could by no stretch
of imagination be held to embrace income in the nature of capital gains realized
on sale of land forming part of the official residence of a ruler.—[Smt. Maharani
Usha Devi v. CIT (1961) 131 ITR 445 (MP)]
Definitions
S.
No. |
Section
|
Definition
of |
(i)
|
2(1B)
|
Amalgamation
|
(ii)
|
2(14)
|
Capital
Asset |
(iii)
|
2(19AA)
|
Demerger
|
(iv)
|
2(22B)
|
Fair
Market Value |
(v)
|
2(29A)
|
Long-Term
Capital Asset |
(vi)
|
2(29B)
|
Long-Term
Capital Gain |
(vii)
|
2(42A)
|
Short-Term
Capital Asset |
(viii)
|
2(42B)
|
Short-Term
Capital Gain |
(ix)
|
2(42C)
|
Slump
sale |
(x)
|
2(47)
|
What
is transfer |
(xi)
|
2(48)
|
Meaning
of Zero Coupon Bond |
It
is pertinent to note that the “Capital Gains” is not defined in the Act. However,
it defines “Capital Asset”.
(i)
10(33) |
Capital
gain on transfer of Units of US 64 |
(ii)
10(36) |
Long-term
capital gain on eligible equity shares |
(iii)
10(37) |
Capital
gains on compensation received on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land
situated within specified urban limits |
(iv)
10(38) |
Capital
gain arising from sale of shares and units |
(v)
10(41) |
Exemption
of capital gain on transfer of an asset of an undertaking engaged in the
business of generation, etc. of power |
Sections
dealing with taxation of income from Capital gains
In
order to have an overview on capital gains taxation, we shall see the sections
of Income Tax Act, 1961 dealing with capital gains taxation. The sections are
as given below:—
S.
No. |
Section
|
Contents
|
1.
|
45
|
Capital
gains—Basis of Charge |
2.
|
45(1A)
|
Capital
gain arises from insurance claim received for demage or destruction of a
capital asset. |
3.
|
45(2)
|
Capital
gain conversion of capital asset into stock-in-trade. |
4.
|
45(2A)
|
Transfer
of securities by depository |
5.
|
45(3)
|
Capital
gain on transfer of a capital asset by a person to a firm/AOP as capital
contribution |
6.
|
45(4)
|
Capital
gain on transfer of capital asset by way of distribution on dissolution of a
firm/AOP |
7.
|
45(5)
|
Capital
gain on transfer by way of compulsory acquisition of an asset |
8. |
45(5A) |
Special
provisions for computation of capital gains in case of Joint Development
Agreement (JDA) |
9.
|
45(6)
|
Capital
gain on repurchase of units of mutual funds under Equity Linked Savings
Schemes |
10.
|
46
|
Capital
gains on distribution of assets by companies in liquidation |
11.
|
46(1)
|
Whether
capital gain arises to company or not |
12.
|
46(2)
|
Whether
capital gain arises to shereholders |
13.
|
46A
|
Capital
gains on purchase by company of its own shares or other specified securities |
14.
|
47
|
Transactions
not regarded as transfer |
15 |
47A
|
Withdrawal
of exemption in certain cases |
16.
|
48
|
Mode
of computation of capital gain |
17.
|
49
|
Cost
with reference to certain modes of acquisition |
18.
|
49(1)
|
Cost
to the previous year |
19.
|
49(2)
|
Cost
of shares of amalgamated companies |
20.
|
49(2A)
|
Cost
of acquisition in the case of shares acquired on conversion of debentures |
21.
|
49(2AA)
|
Cost
of acquisition of shares, etc. under ESOP |
22.
|
49(2AAA)
|
Cost
of the partnership rights of a partner on conversion of a company into LLP |
23.
|
49(2AB)
|
Cost
of shares issued under ESOP if such shares have already been subject to FBT
under section 115WC(1)(ba) |
24.
|
49(2ABB)
|
Cost
of acquisition of share or shares of a company acquired by the non-resident
on redemption of Global Depository Receipts |
25.
|
49(2AC)
|
Cost
of acquisition of Unit of a business trust acquired in consideration of
transfer of asset referred to in section 47(xvii) |
26.
|
49(2AD)
|
Cost
of acquisition of the Units of the consolidation scheme acquired in lieu of
units held in a consolidating scheme |
27.
|
49(2C)
|
Cost
of acquisition of shares in the resulting company |
28.
|
49(2D)
|
Cost
of acquisition of the original shares of the demerged company |
29.
|
49(2E)
|
Cost
of acquisition of the shares of the resulting Co-operative bank and demerged Co-operative
bank |
30.
|
49(3)
|
Cost
of acquisition when exemption is withdrawn under section 47A |
31.
|
50
|
Special
provision for computation of capital gains in case of depreciable assets |
32.
|
50A
|
Special
provision for cost of acquisition in case of depreciable asset |
33.
|
50B
|
Special
provision for computation of capital gains in case of slump sale |
34 |
50C
|
Special
provision for full value of consideration in certain cases |
35.
|
50CA
|
Special
provision for full value of consideration for transfer of share other than
quoted share. |
36.
|
50D
|
Fair
Market Value (FMV) deemed to be full value of consideration in certain cases |
37.
|
51
|
Advance
money received |
38.
|
54
|
Profit
on sale of property used for residence |
39.
|
54B
|
Capital
gain on transfer of land used for agricultural purposes not to be charged in
certain cases |
40.
|
54D
|
Capital
gain on compulsory acquisition of lands and buildings not to be charged in
certain cases |
41.
|
54E
|
Capital
gain on transfer of capital assets not to be charged in certain cases |
42.
|
54EA
|
Capital
gain on transfer of long-term capital assets not to be charged in the case of
investment in specified securities |
43.
|
54EB
|
Capital
gain on transfer of long-term capital assets not to be charged in certain
cases |
44.
|
54EC
|
Capital
gain not to be charged on investment in certain bonds |
45.
|
54ED
|
Capital
gain on transfer of certain listed securities or unit not to be charged in
certain cases |
46.
|
54EE
|
Capital
gain not to be charged on investment in units of a specified fund [w.e.f.
1-4-2017] |
47.
|
54F
|
Capital
gain on transfer of certain capital assets not to be charged in case of
investment in residential house |
48.
|
54G
|
Exemption
of capital gains on transfer of assets in cases of shifting of industrial
undertaking from urban area |
49.
|
54GA
|
Exemption
of capital gains on transfer of assets in cases of shifting of industrial
undertaking from urban area to any Special Economic Zone |
50.
|
54GB
|
Capital
gain on transfer of residential property not to be charged in certain cases |
51.
|
54H
|
Extension
of time for acquiring new asset or depositing
or investing amount of capital gain |
52.
|
55
|
Meaning
of “adjusted”, “cost of improvement” and “cost of acquisition” |
53.
|
55(1)(b)
|
Cost
of improvement |
54.
|
55(2)
|
Cost
of acquisition |
55.
|
55(2)(a)
|
Cost
of acquisition of goodwill of a business, etc. |
56.
|
55(2)(aa)
|
Cost
of acquisition of bonus and right shares |
57.
|
55(2)(ab)
|
Cost
of acquisition of equity shares allotted to the shareholder of a recognized stock exchange
on corporatization |
58.
|
55(2)(ac)
|
Cost
of acquisition in respect of capital assets referred to in section 112A |
59.
|
55(2)(b)
|
Cost
of acquisition of assets acquired before 01.04.2001 |
60.
|
55(3)
|
Where
cost of previous owner is not ascertainable |
61.
|
55A
|
Reference
to Valuation Officer |
62.
|
70
|
Set
off of loss from one source against income from another source under the same
head of income |
63.
|
71
|
Set
off of loss from one head against income from another |
64.
|
74
|
Losses
under the head “Capital gains” |
65.
|
111A
|
Tax
on short-term capital gains in certain cases |
66.
|
112
|
Tax
on long-term capital gains |
67.
|
112A
|
Tax
on Long-term capital gains in certain cases (w.e.f. 1-4-2019) |
68.
|
115AB
|
Tax
on income from units purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising
from their transfer |
69.
|
115AC
|
Tax
on income from bonds or Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign
currency or capital gains arising from their transfer |
70.
|
115ACA
|
Tax
on income from Global Depository Receipts purchased in foreign currency or
capital gains arising from their transfer |
71.
|
115AD
|
Tax
on income of Foreign Institutional Investors from securities or capital gains
arising from their transfer |
72.
|
115E
|
Tax
on investment income and long-term capital gains |
73.
|
115F
|
Capital
gains on transfer of foreign exchange assets not to be charged in certain
cases |
74.
|
115-I
|
Option
not to avail of the provisions of section 115F |
75.
|
194-IA
|
Payment
on transfer of certain immovable property other than agricultural land |
76 |
194-LA
|
Payment
of compensation on acquisition of certain immovable property |
Incredible insights!
ReplyDeleteI want to express my appreciation for sharing such enlightening content generously. Your blog post was an absolute treasure, providing priceless information aboutCapital Gains Tax India. I'm confident that this comprehensive guide will strongly resonate with all readers, especially those seeking expert assistance for tax filings and navigating the intricacies of capital gains.
Eagerly anticipating the continuous sharing of such invaluable insights...