Appointment of witnesses
Before
making a search of a building or a place, the Authorrised Officer is required
to call upon two or more respectable inhabitants of the locality in which the
building of place to be searched is situate to attend and witness the search.
The term locality has to be understood in its natural meaning. It means immediate
vicinity.
It is mandatory to appoint two
independent witnesses before commencing conduct of search
It is a mandatory requirement and the entire search proceedings are
conducted in the presence of two independent witnesses.
The
Authorised Officer should issue an order under Rule 112(6) in writing to the
person selected to attend and witness the search.
Text of Rule 112(6)
(6) Before making a search, the authorised officer shall,—
(a)
|
|
where
a building or place is to be searched, call upon two or more respectable
inhabitants of the locality in which the building or place to be searched is
situate, and
|
(b)
|
|
where
a vessel, vehicle or aircraft is to be searched, call upon any two or more
respectable persons, to attend and witness the search and may issue an order
in writing to them or any of them so to do.]
|
Text of Rule 112(7)
(7) The search shall be made in the presence, of the
witnesses aforesaid and a list of all things seized in the course of such
search and of the places in which they were respectively found shall be
prepared by the authorised officer and signed by such witnesses; but no person
witnessing a search shall be required to attend as a witness of the search in
any proceedings under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (11 of 1922), or the Act
unless specially summoned.
It is not the right of the
assessee to select witnesses of his choice
It is not the right of the assessee to select witnesses of his choice.
However, in practice, selection of witnesses is made by the authorized officer
with the consent of the assessee so that whole proceedings may be carried out
smoothly.
Authorised officer can not
forcibly require any person to act as witness
It is not possible to forcibly require any person to act as witness.
However, a person refusing to act as witness without any justifiable cause,
inspite of direction of the authorized officer may be prosecuted for his
denial.
Selection of witnesses by the
Authorised Officer
The selection of the witness is done by the Authorised Officer. While
selecting witnesses, the Authorised Officer should ensure the following
norms :
(i) The person selected as a witness should not
have a bad reputation
(ii) The person selected as a witness should be
sufficiently educated to understand the process of search.
(iii) No person with a criminal record should be
appointed as a witness.
(iv) A friend or a relative or an employee of the
person whose premises are being searched should not be appointed as a witness.
(v) The person selected as a witness should be
major and a citizen of India (Above 18
years)
(vi) The witness should not be a business rival or
a disgruntled employee or a person hostile to the person(s) in whose case the
search is being carried out or the person who is in the occupation or control
of the premises being searched.
(vii) The person selected as a witness should be
free from any such physical or mental infirmities as would affect his
functioning as a witness
(viii) The legal advisor
or consultant of the person(s), whose premises are being searched, should not
be appointed as a witness.
(ix) Religious sentiments of the person(s) whose
premises are being searched or who are in occupation or control of the premises
being searched should be kept in view while selecting witnesses.
(x) An employee of the Income Tax Department
should not be selected as a witness.
KEY NOTE
Even though witnesses are to be selected by the Authorised Officer, if
the person in whoes case the search is to be conducted or the person in
occupation and control such premises raises any objection against selection of
a particular person as a witness, the Authorised Officer should take such
objection into account before taking a final decision.
Duties of a Witness
The main duties of a witness to the search are, in brief, as under:
(i) He should read and
understand the warrant of authorisation.
(ii) He should witness the search carefully
right from its commencement to its closure. His role as an independent and
impartial witness demands that he carefully observes whether –
(a)
The search and seizure operations are being
carried out in an orderly manner and in accordance with the law, without any
interference and tampering or destruction of any evidence or valuables;
(b)
Statements on oath of persons are being recorded
properly; without any undue influence or coercion;
(c)
Personal search of a female occupant is being
taken only by female members of the search team with a strict regard to
decency;
(d)
Facts relating to the search and seizure are
being recorded correctly and accurately in the panchnama, inventories and all
other relevant documents; and
(e)
In case of continuance of a search on a
subsequent date, the seals are intact at the time of entry and are being broken
in his presence for re-entry to continue the search.
(iii) He should not leave the premises without the
permission of the Authorised Officer. Refusal by a witness to stay till the end
of the search constitutes an offence under section 187 of the Indian Penal
Code. Atleast one of the witnesses should remain in the search premises
throughout the duration of the search.
(iv) He should everything before putting his
signature in all document. He should affix his signature on all packets
containing seized bullion, jewellery, etc. and documents and statements like,
body of the warrant of Authoristion, copy of the Taxpayers’ Charter containing
the rights and the duties of the persons being searched, inventories of books
of account, documents and valuables, panchnama and its various annexures.
(v) He should attend as a witness under the
Act, only if and when summoned. [Rule 112(7), which provides that no person
witnessing a search shall be required to attend as as witness to the search in
any proceedings under the Act unless specifically summoned]
(vi) Ensure that any untoward incident during the
search, should feature in the Panchnama.
KEY NOTE
If a witness raises any objection or makes any point relating to the
process or procedure of search or any matter related thereto, the leader of the
search team should consider and decided the same.
Assessee is right in objecting to
the witness chosen by the Assessing Officer as not belonging to the locality,
and not being respectable
Respectable means impartial and independent. It could be a common man
also. If it were proved that the witnesses were not respectable, it would only
be an irregularity, which would reduce the weight of evidence. - [Sunder Singh v. State of UP 56 SC 411]
When the witness turns hostile
If a witness turns hostile, the Authorised officer should record his
statement. He should be specifically asked to explain his conduct. The services
of a hostile witness should be dispensed with. If because of one or more
witnesses turning hostile, the number of witnesses becomes less than two, other
respectable persons of the locality may be appointed as witnesses.
If any witness refuses to sign the panchnama or any other document
If any witness refuses to
sign the panchnama or any other document, which he is required to sign, during
or at the end of the search, his statement on oath should be recorded. He
should be specifically asked about the reason for such refusal. The leader of
the search team or any other Authorised Officer should should prepare a note
describing the circumstances in which the witness refused to sign the
panchnama. All the members of the search team and remaining witnesses should
sign the note, which shoul be made a part of the panchnama.
Where the conduct of a person appointed as a witness found to be
violation of the provisions of section 187 of IPC
In suitable cases, where
the conduct of a person appointed as a witness is found to be in violation of
the provisions of section 187 of the Indian Penal Code, the matter should be
reported to the Control Room for exploring the possibility of launching
prosecution against him.
Section 187 in The Indian Penal Code
187. OMISSION TO ASSIST PUBLIC SERVANT WHEN BOUND BY LAW TO GIVE
ASSISTANCE.—
Whoever, being bound by law to render or furnish assistance to any
public servant in the execution of his public duty, intentionally omits to give
such assistance, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which
may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees,
or with both; and if such assistance be demanded of him by a public servant
legally competent to make such demand for the purposes of executing any
process lawfully issued by a Court of Justice, or of preventing the commission
of an offence, or of suppressing a riot, or affray, or of apprehending a person
charged with or guilty of an offence, or of having escaped from lawful custody,
shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six
months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.
No comments:
Post a Comment