Sunday, 7 July 2019

AMNESTY & VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE OF INCOME SCHEME


Over time, governments have offered reprieves to the public in the matter of tax evasion based on the rationale that people must be given an opportunity to correct their mistakes and contribute to nation-building.
Tax amnesty is a limited-time opportunity for a specified group of taxpayers to pay a defined amount, in exchange for forgiveness of a tax liability (including interest and penalties) relating to a previous tax period or periods and without fear of criminal prosecution. In India, tax amnesty schemes started soon after the independence. In 1951, first voluntary disclosure schemes were announced which paved way for the declaration of unaccounted funds without the fear of prosecution from tax laws. It was named as VDIS Tyagi Scheme.
[1]  VDIS Tyagi Scheme 1951
In India, tax amnesty schemes started soon after the independence. In 1951, first voluntary disclosure schemes were announced which paved way for the declaration of unaccounted funds without the fear of prosecution from tax laws. It was named as the declaration of unaccounted funds without the fear of prosecution from tax laws. It was named as VDIS Tyagi Scheme.
It allowed assessees (taxpayers) to bring forward unaccounted cash before August 31, 1951, after intimating the Income Tax Officer and paying tax on it. Citizens were assured that they would be protected from penalties or prosecution. As a result of the scheme, Rs. 70.20 crore were disclosed and Rs. 20 crore collected in taxes, but the move was not considered a success, with citizens unsure about assurances of immunity from penalties and prosecution
Focus on tax arrears. Then Minister of State, Mahavir Tyagi for the first time gave immunity to those paying up taxes.

[2]  VDIS “Sixty-Forty” Scheme 1965
In 1965, the government launched four amnesty schemes as it faced shortage of money due to Chinese invasion. The second scheme, "Sixty-Forty", entailed a deposit of 60 per cent of the sum declared as tax.
The ‘Sixty-Forty Scheme’, as it was called, allowed citizens to disclose unaccounted incomes by paying tax at the rate of 60 percent and retaining 40 percent, with immunity from penalty and prosecution. Citizens were assured that disclosures would remain confidential and even courts were prohibited from compelling producing these declarations in any proceedings. Tax was permitted to be paid in two instalments. The black money and taxes collected in this scheme were only Rs. 52.18 crore and Rs. 30.08 crore, respectively, as the tax rate of 60 percent was regarded as too high by the tax evaders.

[3]  The Block Voluntary Disclosure Scheme 1965
It was more successful as the sum declared was treated as a block separate from income declared in normal course. The limited revenue resulting from the previous scheme led the Government of the day to announce another, slightly modified scheme, allowing tax evaders to disclose unaccounted income pertaining to any year up to March 31, 1966. This scheme was popular because tax was payable on such disclosed income of various years taken as a single block, at the rates applicable for the year 1965-66, and not a flat rate of 60 percent. The tax could be paid in instalments extending over four years. It succeeded in bringing out black money to the tune of Rs. 145 crore but the tax collection was very low, Rs.19.45 crore, as most disclosures were made in the names of spouses, children, etc., who were in the lowest slabs. The Wanchoo Committee estimated tax-evaded incomes in 1965 to be around Rs. 1,000 crore.

[4]  Voluntary Disclosure Scheme 1975
This scheme was announced in the wake of the Emergency and allowed tax evaders to declare unaccounted income or wealth of any previous year without fear of levy of interest, penalty, or prosecution. Marginal tax rate brought down from 97.75 per cent to 77 per cent. Slab rates prescribed based on quantum of disclosure. On undisclosed income of up to Rs. 25,000, tax levied at 25 per cent; Between Rs. 25,000 and Rs. 50,000, it was 40 per cent;  and above Rs. 50,000, it was pegged at 60 per cent. In addition, 2.5 per cent of sum declared had to be invested in government notified assets.
The resultant unaccounted income, unaccounted wealth, and Disclosure were Rs. 744 crore and tax clloected were Rs. 241 crore. In 1975, black money was estimated to be 15-18 percent of the GDP: approximately Rs. 9,958 to Rs. 11,870 crore.

[5]   Amnesty Circulars, 1985
Undeterred by the failure of successive schemes, the Government came up with another one in 1985, this time by stealth. This was not even called a Disclosure Scheme and was not made with Parliamentary approval either. It came in the form of seven CBDT circulars issued from 4 June 26, 1985 to February 17, 1986. These allowed tax evaders to disclose their unaccounted incomes and wealth of any year before March 31, 1986 and pay the tax due on it, on the assurance that penal interest would be waived and immunity from penalties would be granted. There was no immunity in respect of excise duty, sales tax, etc. The scheme was extended up to March 31, 1987, and mopped up black money worth about Rs.  700 crore. Though figures for the period 1985 to 1987, are not available, the black money was estimated, by NIPFP, at 20% of the GDP or Rs. 1,00,000 crore.

[6]  Remittances in Foreign Exchange (Immunities) Scheme 1991
Remittances to India are money transfers from non-resident Indians (NRIs) employed outside the country to family, friends or relatives residing in India. India is the world's leading receiver of remittances, claiming more than 12% of the world's remittances in 2015.
The foreign exchange immunity scheme launched by Finance Minister, Manmohan Singh in September 1991. The scheme was aimed at attracting back the illegal foreign currency stashed abroad by resident Indians.
The Remittances of Foreign Exchange and Investment in Foreign Exchange Bond (Immunities & Exemption) Act, 1991 saw about Rs. 2,200 crore of income being declared, with zero taxes payable.
[7]  Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997
The VDIS-1997 was described as “a golden chance for tax evaders to become honest” and the “last chance to come clean”. The scheme allowed evaders, including non-residents, to disclose unaccounted cash, securities or assets, whether in India or abroad, irrespective of the year, or nature, or source of the funds. The reprieve offered was waiver of interest and penalty and immunity from prosecution under laws of income tax, wealth tax, foreign exchange and companies. It was also stated that the particulars supplied by a declarant were to be kept secret. VDIS attracted 475,477 declarations aggregating to Rs. 33,697 crore and a tax realisation of Rs. 9,729 crore. The disclosure resulting from it was only 0.79 percent of the GDP. The black money in 1995-96 was estimated at 40% of the GDP or Rs. 4,00,000 crore.

INTRODUCTION
The Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 shall come into force from the 1st day of July, 1997. Notification to this effect has been issued on 9th June, 1997. Any person can, therefore, make a disclosure of income on or after this date. The last date for making the disclosure of income is the 31st day of December, 1997.

FORM OF DECLARATION
The declaration shall be made to the Commissioner of Income-tax and shall be in the prescribed Form.

RATE OF TAX
The tax payable on the disclosed income in respect of any assessment year shall be at the rate of 35% in the case of companies and firms and 30% in the case of others.
The tax payable under the Scheme is required to be paid before the filing of the declaration. The declaration should be accompanied by the proof of payment of tax. In case a person is not in a position to pay the tax before the filing of the declaration, he may do so within 3 months of the date of filing of the declaration. In such a case simple interest @ 2% shall be charged for every month or part of a month comprised in the period beginning from the date of filing of the declaration to the date of payment of the tax.

Voluntary Disclosure of income — Certificate granted by Commissioner under Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme is binding on assessing officer hence additions cannot be made [Finance Act, 1997]
Dismissing the appeal of the Revenue, the Court held that; The Commissioner having issued the certificate upon the declaration made under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme under section 68(2)  of the Finance Act, 1997, judicial discipline requires that the authorities entrusted with administering law proceed on the basis that the certificate granted by the Commissioner would indicate satisfaction of all the requisite conditions as required by the provisions of the Scheme and it is not open to the subordinate authority to sit in judgment over the certificate granted by the Commissioner. It is not open to the Assessing Officer to go behind the certificate issued by the Commissioner and ignoring it, assess an income which has already borne tax under the Scheme. [BP. 03.11.1996 to 20.10.1997]
[CIT v. Rajiv Enterprise (2017) 396 ITR 364 (Guj)]

[8]   Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998
The Scheme is applicable to tax arrears determined on or before 31.03.1998 but remaining unpaid on the date of declaration under various direct tax enactments. The amount payable by the declarants shall be determined as under:—
(i)    The declarant shall be required to pay tax at 30% (35% in the case of firms and companies) on the amount of income in dispute (in other than search and seizure cases).
(ii)    Where tax arrears include income-tax, interest payable or penalty levied, the amount payable shall be 30% of the disputed income (35% in the case of firms and companies).
(iii)  Where tax arrears comprise only interest payable or penalty levied, the amount payable shall be 50% of the tax arrear.
(iv)  Where tax arrears include the tax, interest or penalty determined in any assessment on the basis of search and seizure proceedings under section 132 or section 132A of the Income-tax Act, the amount payable shall be 40% of the disputed income (45% in the case of firms and companies).
(v)   In respect of arrears under the Wealth-tax Act, the amount payable shall be 1% of disputed wealth where the tax arrears include wealth-tax or interest and penalty levied in addition to wealth-tax. Where tax arrear is only interest payable or penalty levied, 50% of such amount is to be paid. Where the tax arrears are determined on the basis of search and seizure proceedings under section 37A or 37B of the Wealth-tax Act, the tax payable shall be @ 2% of the disputed wealth.
(vi) In respect of tax arrears payable under the Gift-tax Act, the amount payable shall be 30% of the disputed value of the gift where the tax arrears include gift-tax or interest payable and penalty levied in addition to gift-tax. Where tax arrear is only interest payable or penalty levied, 50% of such amount shall be paid.
(vii) In respect of tax arrears payable under the Expenditure-tax Act, the amount payable shall be 10% of the disputed chargeable expenditure where the tax arrear comprises expenditure-tax or includes interest payable and penalty in addition to expenditure-tax. Where the arrear is only in respect of interest or penalty, only 50% of the arrear shall be payable.
(viii) In respect of tax arrears payable under the Interest-tax Act, the amount payable shall be @ 2% of the disputed chargeable interest where tax arrear includes interest tax or interest payable and penalty levied in addition to interest tax. If the tax arrears include only interest or penalty, the amount payable will be 50% of the tax arrear.
Scheme shall not apply in the following cases
(i)   in a case where prosecution for concealment has been launched under any direct tax enactment or where a person has been convicted for such offence;
(ii)   in a case where no appeal or reference or writ petition is admitted and pending before any appellate authority or the High Court or the Supreme Court or no revision application is pending before the Commissioner;
(iii)  in a case where order has been passed by the Settlement Commission under section 245D(4) of the Income-tax Act or under sub-section (4) of section 22D of the Wealth-tax Act;
(iv) in respect of a person against whom prosecution for any offence punishable under Chapter IX or XVII of the Indian Penal Code, the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act or for the purpose of enforcement of any civil liability has been instituted or the person has been convicted of any such offence;
(v)  in respect of a person against whom an order of detention has been issued under the COFEPOSA Act;
(vi)   in respect of a person who has been notified under the Specified Court (Trial of Offences relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.
Time and manner of payment of tax arrears
Within sixty days from the date of receipts of declaration, the designated authority shall, by order, determine the amount payable by the declarant in accordance with the provisions of scheme and grant certificate of tax arrears and sum payable after such determination towards full and final settlement of tax arrears. The declarant shall pay sum determined by the designated authority within thirty days of the passing of an order by designated authority.

Appellate Authority not to proceed in certain cases
Relating to disputed chargeable expenditure, disputed chargeable interest, disputed income, disputed wealth, disputed value of gift or tax arrears specified in section. In case appeal is filed by the department of Central Government in respect of issue relating to same issue except where tax arrears comprise only penalty, fines or interest)

No refund of amount paid under the Scheme
Any amount paid in pursuance of a declaration made under section 88 shall not be refundable under any circumstances.

Immunity from prosecution and imposition of penalty in certain cases
Grant immunity from instituting prosecution for any offence under any direct tax enactment, or indirect tax enactments, or from the imposition of penalty under any of such enactment, in respect of matters covered in the declaration under section 88.

[9]  Undisclosed Income Under Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016 [IDS 2016]
Income declaration scheme, 2016 was an amnesty scheme introduced by Government of India as a part of the 2016 Union budget to unearth black money and bring it back into the system. Lasting from 01.06.2016 to 30.09.2016, the scheme provided an opportunity to income-tax and wealth-tax defaulters to avoid litigation and become compliant by declaring their assets, paying the tax on them and a penalty of 45% thereafter. Under IDS 2016, 71,726 declarations were made of income amounting to Rs. 67,382 crore and approximately.

The scheme guaranteed immunity from prosecution under the Income Tax Act, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, and the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 and also ensured that declarations under it would not be subjected to any scrutinies or inquiries.

What can be declared under IDS?
The scheme shall apply to undisclosed income whether in the form of investment in assets or otherwise, pertaining to Financial Year 2015-16 or previous years.
v  However, foreign assets or income to which the Black Money Act, 2015 applies are not eligible for declaration under this scheme.
v  If one has failed to furnish Income Tax Return of previous years under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, such income can now be declared under this new scheme. (In case if you have received any notices under section 142(1) or 143(2) or 148 or 153A or 153C, your case may not be eligible for this scheme).
Undisclosed Income
1. Bullion, jewellery or precious stone
2. Archaeological collections
3. Drawings, paintings, sculptures or any work of art
4. Shares & securities (quoted & unquoted)
5. Immovable property
6. Interest in a partnership firm                                                                               
7. Any other asset such as:—
(i)   Undisclosed Bank Accounts
(ii)  Fixed Deposit
(iii) Deposit in Cooperative Bank
(iv) Investment in Credit Co-operative Societies
(v)  Unaccounted transactions with financial institutions etc.
            Relating to any financial year up to 2015-16

Who can make a Declaration?
All “Persons” such as
1. Individuals
2. HUFs
3. Companies
4. Firms
5. Association of Persons

Scheme at Glance
Commencement of Scheme
From 01.06.2016
Last date for making a declaration
Last date for making a declaration 30.09.2016
Last date for making payment of Tax, Surcharge & Penalty
30.09.2017

Declaration Forms
Form 1
Declaration form (to be filed by declarant by 30.09.2016)
Form 2
Acknowledgment of declaration (to be issued by PCIT/CIT within 15 days from the end of the month in which declaration is filed)
Form 3
Intimation of payment of tax, surcharge & penalty (to be furnished by declarant to PCIT/CIT by 30.11.2016).
Form 4
Certificate of declaration (to be granted by PCIT/CIT within 15 days from the date of intimation of payment).

Amounts payable by declarant
(a)        Tax @ 30% of undisclosed income
(b)        Surcharge @ 7.5% of undisclosed income
(c)        Penalty @ 7.5% of undisclosed income
Total 45% of undisclosed income declared scheme

Time schedule for making payments under Income Declaration Scheme
Time schedule for making payments under the Scheme as under:—
(i)    a minimum amount of 25% of the tax, surcharge and penalty to be paid by 30.11.2016;
(ii)  a further amount of 25% of the tax, surcharge and penalty to
be paid by 31.3.2017; and
(iii) the balance amount to be paid on or before 30.09.2017.

Tax in respect of voluntarily disclosed income not refundable [Section 191]
Any amount of tax and surcharge paid under section 184 or penalty paid under section 185 in pursuance of a declaration made under section 183 shall not be refundable.

Benefits of Declaration
(i)     No Wealth Tax on assets declared
(ii)    No scrutiny or enquiry under Income-tax Act and Wealth Tax Act in respect of declaration
(iii)   Immunity from prosecution under Income Tax Act and Wealth Tax Act in respect of declaration
(iv)  Immunity from Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, subject to transfer of assets by the benamidar to the real owner before 30.09.2017
(v)   Undisclosed income declared not to be included in total income [Section 188] The amount of undisclosed income declared in accordance with section 183 shall not be included in the total income of the declarant for any assessment year under the Income-tax Act, if the declarant makes  the payment of tax and surcharge referred to in section 184 and the penalty referred to in section 185, by the date specified under subsection (1) of section 187.

Undisclosed income declared not to affect finality of completed assessments [Section 189]
A declarant under this Scheme shall not be entitled, in respect of undisclosed income declared or any amount of tax and surcharge paid thereon, to re-open any assessment or reassessment made under the
Income-tax Act or the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (27 of 1957), or claim any set off or relief in any appeal, reference or other proceeding in relation to any such assessment or reassessment.

Undisclosed income declared not to be treated as benami transaction in certain cases [Section 190]
The provisions of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 (45 of 1988) shall not apply in respect of the declaration of undisclosed income made in the form of investment in any asset, if the asset existing in the name of a benamidar is transferred to the declarant, being the person who provides the consideration for such asset, or his legal representative, within the period notified by the Central Government.

Declaration not admissible in evidence against declarant [Section 192]
Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, nothing contained in any declaration made under section 183 shall be admissible in evidence against the declarant for the purpose of any proceeding relating to imposition of penalty, other than the penalty leviable under section 185, or for the purposes of prosecution under the Income-tax Act or the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (27 of 1957).
Exemption from wealth-tax in respect of assets specified in declaration [Section 194]
(1) Where the undisclosed income is represented by cash (including bank deposits), bullion, investment in shares or any other assets specified in the declaration made under section 183—
(a)  in respect of which the declarant has failed to furnish a return under section 14 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (27 of 1957), for the assessment year commencing on or before the 1st day of April, 2015; or
(b)  which have not been shown in the return of net wealth furnished by him for the said assessment year or years; or
(c) which have been understated in value in the return of net wealth furnished by him for the said assessment year or years, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (27 of 1957), or any rules made thereunder,—
(i)   wealth-tax shall not be payable by the declarant in respect of the assets referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) and such assets shall not be included in his net wealth for the said assessment year or years;
(ii) the amount by which the value of the assets referred to in clause (c) has been understated in the return of net wealth for the said assessment year or years, to the extent such amount does not exceed the voluntarily disclosed income utilised for acquiring such assets, shall not be taken into account in computing the net wealth of the declarant for the said assessment year or years.
Explanation : Where a declaration under section 183 is made by a firm, the assets referred to in sub-clause (i) or, as the case may be, the amount referred to in sub-clause (ii) shall not be taken into account in computing the net wealth of any partner of the firm or, as the case may be, in determining the value of the interest of any partner in the firm.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply unless the conditions specified in sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 187 are fulfilled by the declarant.

Non-Applicability
(i)            Notice has been issued under section 142(1)/143(2)/ 148/153A/153C of IT Act (debarred only for AY for which notice is issued)
(ii)          Search/Survey have been conducted
(iii)     Income sought to be declared is chargeable under the Black Money Act, 2015
(iv)      COFEPOSA detainees, persons notified under Special Courts Act, 1992, cases of prosecution under NDPS Act, Prevention of Corruption Act, and certain offences under Indian Penal Code

Normal tax paid cannot be adjusted against tax on Income Disclosed under IDS - 2016
Advance tax, self assessed tax and TDS paid prior to filing of declaration, should not be adjusted towards discharge of assessee’s liability to pay tax, surcharge and penalty under the scheme of Income Tax Declaration Scheme, 2016 in absence of any specific provision in the scheme, granting benefit of the self assessed tax or advance tax under the Act. (Related Assessment Years : 2011-12, 2012-13)
[Umesh D. Ganore v. PCIT - Date of Judgement : 08.03.2019 (Bom)]
        
         Power to remove difficulties- Not depositing the first instalment with in time – Board refusing to condonation of delay - Concession and excess indulgence would demotivating effect on honest taxpayers making regular and prompt tax deposit - Dismissal of application is held to be justified
Petitioner challenged the order of the CBDT to condone the delay in paying first instalment of the  tax payable under IDS 2016 . Dismissing the petition the Court held that the view expressed by the CBDT stating that,  concession and excess indulgence would demotivating effect on honest taxpayers making regular and prompt tax deposit . Accordingly dismissal of application is held to be justified. (WP N0. 14395 of 2018 dated 29.01.2019)

[Sadhana R. Jain v. CBDT (2019) 307 CTR 207 : 174 DTR 385 (Bom)]


[10]  Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme 2016
This scheme is aimed at accomplishing two-fold objectives: reduction of huge backlog of cases and realization of dues expeditiously for the Government.

Introduction
The Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme (‘the Scheme’) has been introduced as a part of the Finance Act, 2016 providing an opportunity to taxpayers to settle their pending tax disputes. The scheme is incorporated as Chapter X of the Finance Act, 2016 comprising of sections 200 to 211.

When to make declaration
The scheme is in force from 1st June, 2016 and will end on 31st December, 2016. Thus, declarant has time till 31st January, 2017 to settle his pending litigation.

Who can make declaration
Every person i.e. individual, HUF, company, firm, etc., irrespective of his residential status can settle his tax dispute under this scheme in respect of tax arrears and specified tax.

Tax Arrear
Amount of tax, interest or penalty determined under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘IT Act’) or Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (‘WT Act’), in respect of which appeal is pending before the CIT(A) or CWT(A) as on 29th February, 2016.

Specified Tax
Tax determined in consequence of or is validated by an amendment made with retrospective effect in Income Tax Act or Wealth Tax Act, for a period prior to the date of enactment of such amendment and a dispute in respect of which is pending as on 29th February, 2016.

Under the Scheme
If the amount of disputed tax is
(a)        Upto Rs. 10 lakh, complete waiver from levy of penalty and from initiation of prosecution is provided on payment of assessed tax along with the interest.
(b)        More than Rs. 10 lakh, the declarant is required to pay only 25% of the minimum penalty leviable along with the due tax and interest.

The scheme is applicable to “tax arrear”
Which is defined as the amount of tax, interest or penalty determined under the Income-tax Act or the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 in respect of which appeal is pending before the Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) or the Commissioner of Wealth-tax (Appeals) as on the 29th day of February, 2016.

Who cannot make a declaration
The scheme shall not be applicable in case where prosecution has been initiated before 29.02.2016.
(i)         Search or survey cases where the declaration is in respect of tax arrears.
(ii)       Cases relating to undisclosed foreign income and assets.
(iii)     Cases based on information received under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement under section 90 or 90A of the Income-tax Act where the declaration is in respect of tax arrears.
(iv)      Person notified under Special Courts Act, 1992.
(v)        Cases covered under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Indian Penal Code, Prevention of Corruption Act or Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974.

How to apply under this scheme
Make an application before the Designated Authority (DA) being Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT)/Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT).

No refund of taxes paid under the scheme
Any amount paid in pursuance of declaration shall not be refundable.

[11]  Taxation and Investment Regime for Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, 2016 (PMGKY 2016)
The PMGKY was an amnesty scheme announced in November 2016 for the period running up to 10.05.2017. This scheme was for people who had not taken advantage of the previously concluded IDS and who continued to hold unaccounted-for money or had deposited it in their bank accounts after demonetisation.

The PMGKY scheme, which ended on 10.05.2017, saw income amounting to Rs.  4,900 crore being declared by 21,000 people with tax and penalty collections totalling Rs. 2,451 crore. This was much lower than the earlier four-month long tax compliance window of the IDS.

Name of the scheme
This scheme may be called the PRADHAN MANTRI GARIB KALYAN YOJANA, 2016. Taxation and Investment Regime for Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, 2016 (PMGKY 2016) has commenced since 17.12.2016 and last date for declarations under the Scheme has been extended upto 10.05.2017.

Declarations not eligible for the scheme in certain cases
The provisions of the scheme shall not be applicable in the following cases:—
(i)            Declarations in relation to any person in respect of whom an order of detention has been made under the Conservation of  Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 subject to the conditions specified under the Scheme.
(ii)          Declarations in relation to prosecution for any offence punishable under Chapter IX or Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 and the Prevention of Money- Laundering Act, 2002;
(iii)        If the declarant is a person notified under section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992;
(iv)         Declarations in relation to any undisclosed foreign income and asset which is chargeable to tax under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015.

Tax rate to be paid
The exact is 49.9 percent, the breakup for which is as follows:  Undisclosed income in the form of cash & bank deposit can be declared:

A. Tax, Surcharge, Penalty payable:
(i)     Tax @ 30% of income declared
(ii)    Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Cess @33% of tax
(iii)   Penalty @10% of income declared

(B)  Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Deposit Scheme, 2016
25% of declared income to be deposited in interest free Deposit Scheme for four years. This amount is proposed to be utilised for the schemes of irrigation, housing, toilets, infrastructure, primary education, primary health, livelihood, etc.
                                                      
EXAMPLE
For Undisclosed income of Rs. 10,00,000
v  Tax @ 30% of the undisclosed income, Tax will be Rs. 3,00,000
v  Penalty @ 10% of the undisclosed income, penalty will be Rs. 1,00,000
v  Surcharge @ 33% of tax i.e 33% of Rs. 3,00,000 will be Rs. 99,000
        Total tax & penalty payable: Rs 4,99,000
And above that 25% of undisclosed income in a Deposit Scheme i.e Rs 2,50,000 will be locked in for 4 years without accruing any interest.

Requirement of deposit of 25 percent of undisclosed income
After paying tax as specified above, the person shall also have to deposit 25 percent of the undisclosed income in the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Deposit Scheme, 2016 with a lock-in period of four years.
Along with the above-said tax, penalty, and cess, the declarant will have to deposit 25% of undisclosed income in a Deposit Scheme to be notified by the RBI under the ‘Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Deposit Scheme, 2016’. This amount is proposed to be utilized for the schemes of irrigation, housing, toilets, infrastructure, primary education, primary health, livelihood, etc., so that there is justice and equality. This is a FREE deposit scheme of four years. The withdrawal of amount shall be after four years and will be subject to some conditions as may be specified.

No interest on deposit
The 25 percent deposited shall not carry interest.

Eligibility for Deposits
The deposit under this Scheme shall be made by any person who intends to declare undisclosed income under sub-section (1) of section 199C of the Taxation and Investment Regime for Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, 2016.

Form of the deposits
(1)  The deposits shall be held at the credit of the declarant in Bonds Ledger Account maintained with Reserve Bank of India.
(2)  A certificate of holding the deposit shall be issued to declarant in Form I.
(3) The Reserve Bank of India shall transfer the deposit received under this Scheme into the designated Reserve Fund in the Public account of the Government of India.

Subscription and Mode of investment in the Bonds Ledger Account
(i) The deposits shall be accepted at all the authorised banks notified by Government of India.
(ii) The deposits shall be made in multiples of rupees one hundred.
(iii) The deposit under sub-section (1) of section 199F by a declarant shall not be less than twenty-five per cent. of the undisclosed income to be declared under sub-section (1) of section 199C of the Act.
(iv) The entire deposit to be made under sub-section (1) of section 199F under this Scheme shall be made, in a single payment, before filing declaration under sub-section (1) of section 199C.
(v) The deposit shall be made in the form of cash or draft or cheque or by electronic transfer and shall be drawn in favour of the authorised bank accepting such deposit.

Effective date of deposit
The effective date of opening of the Bonds Ledger Account shall be the date of tender of cash or the date of realisation of draft or cheque or transfer through electronic transfer.

Applications
(1) An application for the deposit under this Scheme shall be made in Form II clearly indicating the amount, full name, Permanent Account Number (hereinafter referred to as ‘PAN’), Bank Account details (for receiving redemption proceeds), and address of the declarant: Provided that if the declarant does not hold a PAN, he shall apply for a PAN and provide the details of such PAN application along with acknowledgement number.
(2) The application under sub-paragraph (1) shall be accompanied by an amount which shall not be less than twenty-five per cent. of the undisclosed income to be declared in the form of cash or draft or cheque or through electronic transfer as provided under sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) of paragraph 4.

Nomination
(1)  A sole holder or a sole surviving holder of a Bonds Ledger Account, being an individual, may nominate in Form III, one or more persons who shall be entitled to the Bonds Ledger Account and the payment thereon in the event of his death.
(2)  Where any amount is payable to two or more nominees and either or any of them dies before such payment becomes due, the title to the Bonds Ledger Account shall vest in the surviving nominee or nominees and the amount being due thereon shall be paid accordingly. In the event of the nominee or nominees predeceasing the holder, the holder may make a fresh nomination.
(3)  A nomination made by a holder of Bonds Ledger Account may be varied by a fresh nomination, or may be cancelled by giving notice in writing to the Authorised Bank in Form IV.
(4)  Every nomination and every cancellation or variation shall be registered at the Reserve Bank of India through the authorised bank and shall be effective from the date of such registration.
(5)  If the nominee is a minor, the holder of Bonds Ledger Account may appoint any person to receive the Bonds Ledger Account or the amount due in the event of his death.

Transferability
The transferability of the Bonds Ledger Account shall be limited to nominee or to the legal heir of an individual holder, in the event of his death.

Tradability against Bonds
The Bonds Ledger Account shall not be tradable.

Repayment
The Bonds Ledger Account shall be repayable on the expiration of four years from the date of deposit and redemption of such Bonds Ledger Account before its maturity date shall not be allowed.

Declaration under Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana Scheme,2016 after search and seizure – Retention was held to be valid -Court directed to release of small part of seized amount
The assessee filed a writ petition challenging a portion of Circular No. 2 of 2017 dated January 18, 2017 (2017) 390 ITR (St.) 125) by which the Board disabled a person from seeking adjustment of the cash seized by the Department and deposited in the public deposit account, towards payment of tax, surcharge and penalty under the Scheme. The Court held that, retention was held to be valid however  the  Court directed to  release of small part of seized amount. The Court also observed that  release would not hamper either any investigation or further proceedings on the part of the Department.

[Jaya Balajee Real Media (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2018) 404 ITR 124 : 303 CTR 489 : 167 DTR 465 (T&AP)]


Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojna, 2016 – Court declined to enter into or encroach upon policy making arena and suggest a different policy on ground that it was not within its domain  [Constitution of India]
Challenging Section 199A of the Finance Act, 2016, Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojna, 2016, the petitioner urged for a different and better scheme which could have got more good money in banks and honest taxpayers would have deposited amount. However, Court declined to enter into or encroach upon policy making arena and suggest a different policy on ground that it was not within its domain court, therefore there was no justification to issue notice in instant petition and accordingly it was dismissed.
[Siddharth Mehta v. UOI (2017) 244 Taxman 289 (SC)]


No comments:

Post a Comment